Employment Law Representative Cases

Attorneys Committed To Protecting Employee Rights

Have you been harassed, discriminated against or denied your rights at work? The attorneys at Voudris Law LLC represent workers who have been wrongfully terminated or denied overtime pay.

Voudris Law LLC has filed more than 325 employment-related lawsuits or arbitrations over the past twelve years. Find the right advocate for your case who has gained the confidence and trust of clients. The following are a few examples of the type of cases our lawyers have filed against employers:

Contact an attorney

Disability Discrimination: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic, Aramark, Brightside Academy, Cars Recon, Chelm Properties, Cleveland Housing Network, CSL Plasma, CVS, Energizer, Family Dollar Stores, Grande Oaks, Great Lakes Storage, Hyatt, Keystone Peer Review, Morrison Healthcare, Mr. Bults, Nextant Aerospace, Owners Management, Parking Solutions, Parkside Care, PPG Industries, Q-Lab, Safeguard Properties, Sheetz, Serrato, Shepp Electric, South Shore Cable Construction, Sparton Medical Systems, Tradesmen International, Tremco, Wellington Place

Age Discrimination: Ag-Pro Ohio, Bremec Garden Centers, Burger King, Claddagh Irish Pub, Compass Group USA, Guitar Center, Mr. Chicken, Paragon Systems, US Acute Care Solutions, Vista Springs, West Park Academy

Overtime Violations: Auburn-Bainbridge Excavating, Bath Manor, Breitenbach Wine Cellars, Calhoun Funeral Homes, Caretenders of Cleveland, CBHV, Cleveland Treatment Center, Covenant Security, G4S, Grace Hospice, HMD Properties, Import Glass, Integrity Field Services, Kensington Care Center, Kent Corp., Laird Plastics, Landmark Plastic, North Shore Transportation, Ohio Catholic Federal Credit Union, OhioGuidestone, Ohio Technical College, Omni Systems, Republic Steel, Stancato’s, Stride Tool, TMT Consolidated, V3 Transportation, Walgreens, Waterstone, Window King

Sexual Harassment: Burger King, Cadillac Ranch, Imperial Electric, Netshape Technologies, Northern States Metals, Pomeroy IT Solutions, Revenue Assistance, Service Companies, Shoot Point Blank, Wendy’s, Westwood Country Club

Race Discrimination: Aramark, Cars Recon, Golden Living Center, Gregory Trucking, Produce Packaging, Renewal by Anderson, Rent-A-Center, Target, Walgreens, Wireless U of Ohio d/b/a T-Mobile

Hostile Work Environment: Cleveland Clinic, DialAmerica, Interdesign, Kinetico, Medic Home Health Care, Neway Stamping & Manufacturing, Perkins, Plastic Materials, Spectrum Diversified Designs, Superior Beverage Group, Welsh Home

Sex Discrimination: Garda, Genesis Health Care, Hope Homes, PeopleReady, RV Horizons, University Hospitals, Verizon Wireless

FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) Violations: AZZ Galvanizing, Cardinal Health, Cleveland Clinic, Eastbrook Healthcare, Golden Living Center, Graphic Packaging, Henkel, JV Janitorial, Menorah Park Center, National General Management, Omnova Solutions, United Way, University Hospitals, Viking Forge, Wal-Mart

Retaliation: American Tire Distributors, AVI Food Systems, Dixon Valve, Family Life Counseling, Green Circle Growers, ITS Traffic Systems, JS Paris Excavating, Kelly Services, Mercy Health, Parker Rust-Proof, Parkside Care, Permco, Sherwood Transportation, University Suburban Health Center, VSM Sewing, Wendy’s

Pregnancy Discrimination: Cafe Fresh Express, Royal Plastics

National Origin Discrimination: Sysco, West-Ward Pharmaceuticals

Religious Discrimination: Atlas Steel Products, Car Parts Warehouse, Hardwood Lumber, Imperial Heating, Mr. Hero

Minimum Wage: McDonald’s, Neetu Foods, Panini’s, Stancato’s, State-Wide Express, Vixcon

Wrongful Discharge: Cameron General Contractors, CHN Housing Partners, Expert Crane, Henkel, Learning Care Group, Maximus Human Services, MUY Hamburger, Service Companies, Sunoco

Severance or Non-Compete Agreements: Famous Enterprises, Perio

Breach of Employment Contract: GEM Electric

Wage and Hour Collective Action Cases:

Carter v. Stancato’s Italian Restaurant (Northern District of Ohio Federal Ct.) (collective action of similarly situated servers who were allegedly forced to participate in an illegal tip pool by being required to share their tips with dishwashers and management)
Zaucha v. Panini’s aka LLO, Inc. (Northern District of Ohio Federal Ct.) (collective action of similarly situated servers and bartenders who allegedly were not paid at least minimum wage because of required deductions for missing silverware and plates, for cleaning expenses, and for missing liquor)
Rodriquez v. Briarwood Healthcare Community (Summit County Common Pleas Ct.) (collective action of similarly situated health aid employees who allegedly were not paid for working through lunch)
Salameh v. Zayed (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Ct.) (collective action of similarly situated employees who were not paid overtime while working at a Sunoco gas station)
Martinez v. Maloney Jr. dba Andrews Auto Service (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Ct.) (collective action of similarly situated employees who were not paid overtime while working at an auto repair shop)

Chagrin Falls, Ohio, Employment law Lawyer

Other Employment Claims:

Lint v. South Euclid Childcare and Enrichment Center, LLC (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Ct.) (judgment for plaintiff in case involving employee being required to work during lunch hour but not being paid any wages for lunch hour, and employee not being paid overtime despite working more than 40 hours a week)
Carson v. Gardens of Western Reserve, Inc. (National Labor Relations Board) (settlement of asserted violation of the National Labor Relations Act where employee was fired for complaining about working conditions on Facebook; employer offered to reinstate employee to her job)
In re Inverted Healthcare Staffing, LLC d/b/a United Medsource, 365 NLRB No. 103 (National Labor Relations Board) (judgment for violation of the National Labor Relations Act where employee was fired for sending an email to other employees raising concerns about job security)

Unemployment Compensation:

V.H. v. Ohio North East Health Systems (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
B.P. v. Fab Tech (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
C.C. v. Cleveland Housing Network (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
J.W. v. Ohio Automobile Club dba AAA (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
R.M. v. Kindred Healthcare (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
C. P. v. Aurora Manor Nursing Home (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing
W. G. v. Service Companies (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
B. H. v. RX Options, Inc. (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
F. K. v. South Shore Cable Construction Inc. (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
A. H. v. Perio Inc. (unemployment benefits awarded after telephone hearing)
E. A. v. Target Corp. (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
O. M. v. Akwen Ltd. dba Wendy's (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
K. W. v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation (unemployment benefits awarded after in-person hearing)
Lorton v. Gliatech, Inc. (Ohio Court of Appeals) (unemployment benefits)

Other Cases:

Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. Dahn (S.D. Fla.) ($1.2 million judgment against insurance agent for misappropriating premium payments from senior citizens)
Libby v. American Bankers Sales Corp., 369 Ill. App. 3d 1051 (Ill. App. Ct.) (affirming summary judgment of tortious interference with employment relations claim)
3B's Realty Co. v. American Industrial Properties REIT, 869 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA) (real estate fraud claim)
Sutherland v. ITT Residential Capital Corp., 702 N.E.2d 436 (Ohio Ct. App.) (affirming class action settlement over the objections of proposed interveners)
McIlraith v. General Electric Capital Assurance Co., 146 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (S.D. Fla.) (life insurance coverage matter)
Adelstein v. Unicare Life and Health Insurance Co., 135 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (M.D. Fla.) (ERISA make whole doctrine)
Demyan v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22699 (S.D. Fla.) (ERISA litigation)
Ward v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of America, 383 F. Supp. 2d 882 (S.D. Miss.) (tortious interference, breach of fiduciary duty, accounting, slander, and trade secret claims)

Past results in the above cases are not a guarantee of future results. The mere fact that a particular type of case was resolved for a particular amount should not be taken to indicate that all such similar cases would be resolved for a like sum. Each case is unique and dependent on the particular facts and circumstances of that case, the law in effect at the time the case was decided, the strengths and weaknesses of the case, the severity of the damages, the credibility of the witnesses, and numerous other case-specific factors that influence the settlement or verdict amounts.